Watching PR traffic from selected sources

Friday, September 18, 2009

JINSA Report #925 They're Back

JReports banner

JINSA Report #925
September 18, 2009
The Officers and the Board of Directors wish the members and friends of JINSA a happy, healthy and peaceful New Year.

They're Back


Assume for the moment that President Obama's sea-based interceptor plan adequately addresses the threat posed to Europe by Iran.  Further assume that Secretary Gate's shift from selling his former president's proposal to selling his current president's proposal represents an honest evaluation of a changing threat based on intelligence information that is complete and accurate. 
 
Those are very big assumptions, but go with them for a moment.
 
If true, one could assume the American administration simply found a happy confluence of events - a desire to "reset" U.S. relations with Russia; Russia not wanting the heavy American commitment to Poland and the Czech Republic that would come with the land based radars and interceptors; and a change in the objective threat that allows the President to do what Russia wants while preserving security in Europe. With that out of the way, the U.S. and Russia can get moving on the START talks - with the possibility of a treaty that can be signed in a photogenic ceremony.
 
What's the problem? The problem is that it walks the world back more than 60 years, restores the Cold War balance of power, and reminds countries yet again that America's reliability as an ally is questionable. [What Americans think of as an admirable change in leadership every four or eight years is sometimes seen by others as dangerous instability. And sometimes it is.]
 
Russia's unchanging goal since the end of WWII has been to weaken or sever the Atlantic Alliance; to separate the U.S. from NATO.  After 1991, the liberated countries attached themselves to the West.  They would be "Central Europe," their historic designation next to "Western Europe," and would be "Eastern Europe" no more.  They joined NATO.  They went to Iraq and Afghanistan.  The United States inside the NATO alliance was supposed to be the guarantor of "Europe whole and free."  While the Russians were trying at a minimum to restore themselves as a superpower with a sphere of influence in Europe.
 
It took the Russians 20 years, but they're back.  Russian President Medvedev said, "Naturally, we will have to conduct substantial, expert consultation... we will work together to develop effective measures...that take into account the interests and concerns of all sides and ensure equal security for all countries in European territory."  He said President Obama had a "responsible attitude."
 
Russia and the U.S., together "ensuring" security for the "European territory."  How secure do the Poles feel today, or the Czechs?  How do the Romanians or the Hungarians feel about Russia assuming the role of their "security guarantor"?  Do the Georgians and Ukrainians think President Obama is being "responsible" with their future?  Did the President of the United States think it would be easier to deal with one dictatorial country rather than more than two-dozen free countries in various messy states of political evolution?
 
If he is expecting to find the Russians eager to hit that "reset" button, he may need to reconsider.  Dmitry Rogozin, Russia's ambassador to NATO, said of the abandonment of the missile/radar sites and the Polish and Czech governments that made the difficult political decisions to host them, "The Americans have simply corrected their own mistake.  We are not duty bound to pay someone for putting their own mistakes right."
 
The Poles and the Czechs this morning may be forgiven for wondering how to put their own mistakes right.

Archive of past JINSA Reports

Support JINSA, click here!

email: feedback@jinsa.org
phone: 202-667-3900
web: http://www.jinsa.org

Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to davidlevy68.people@blogger.com by info@jinsa.org.
The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs | 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 515 | Washington | DC | 20036

No comments: