Watching PR traffic from selected sources

Friday, December 19, 2008

December 2008 JINSA Newsletter

JINSA Logo- Blue
JINSA News
December 2008
In This Issue
Admiral Michael Mullen
JINSA Fall Board Meeting
Taiwan and Barak Obama
Visit to Quantico
Florida Office Opens


  New LEEP Information Page with Video

Click here to visit the new LEEP information page

  New JINSA Website!

JINSA has a new look!  Please visit the newest version of JINSA Online, and check back for updates, featured articles and upcoming events.

www.jinsa.org

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs'
Speech to JINSA

On December 8, 2008, Admiral Michael Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was the recipient of the prestigious Henry M. "Scoop" Jackson Award. The following video is Admiral Mullen's keynote address at JINSA's 2008 Jackson Award dinner.

Click here to watch Admiral Mullen's keynote address.

An Array of Speakers at the JINSA
Fall Board Meeting

On December 8th and 9th, JINSA held its Fall meeting of the Board of Directors.  Highlights of the two day meeting were a panel anchored by Michael Ledeen discussing the internal dynamics of Iran, the presentation of the Grateful Nation Awards, and presentations by Dr. Michael Oren of the Shalem Center and Dr. George Friedman, founder of Stratfor.  Check JINSA's website regularly over the coming weeks for full reports on all of the speakers at this two-day event.

Taiwan's Reaction to the Election
of Barak Obama


JINSA Advisory Board Member Ambassador Harvey Feldmen explains in an exclusive article that it would be difficult to think of an American president who disdained Taiwan more than George W. Bush. In Taipei, however, they think Democrats are more likely to succumb to the lure of China and in doing so, sacrifice Taiwan's interests.

Click here to read the full article.

JINSA Visits Marine Corps Base Quantico

On November 18-19, a JINSA delegation co-chaired by Board of Directors members Jonathan Hochberg and Jonathan Loew visited Marine Corps Base Quantico to observe the making of United States Marine Corps officers.

Click here to read the full article.

JINSA Opens New Office in Florida

JINSA opened its first satellite office on October 28 in Davie, Florida (metro Miami). The office will house members of JINSA's development team. The local Jewish Journal newspaper covered the Open House event hosted by members of JINSA's professional staff.

Click here to read the article in the local Jewish Journal newspaper.


Important! - Do not click on the "Unsubscribe" link at the top of this e-mail or you will be removed from all JINSA lists including JINSA Reports.  If you wish to unsubscribe please contact JINSA at feedback@jinsa.org
Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to davidlevy68.people@blogger.com by info@jinsa.org.
JINSA | 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 515 | Washington | DC | 20036

Thursday, December 18, 2008

JINSA Report #837 Policy Principles: Part II (Israel, again)

JReports banner

JINSA Report #837
December 18, 2008
Policy Principles: Part II
(Israel, again)


President-elect Obama called the status quo between Israel and the Palestinians "unsustainable" and that "Israel has a security interest in solving this." Solving what?  

Certainly Israel has a security interest in stopping the barrage of increasingly long-range and accurate rockets and missiles from Gaza and the continuing attempts by West Bank Palestinians to carry explosives through those "humiliating" IDF checkpoints. Whether Israel has a security interest in the establishment of a Palestinian state in part of the West Bank and/or Gaza while Hamas and Fatah are engaged in a civil war (including on the West Bank) and Hamas is engaged in a war against Israel is entirely debatable.  

Of great concern is the idea afloat in American circles that a Palestinian state should be established before Israel achieves verifiable Palestinian acceptance of its legitimacy, and that such a state should be established on the West Bank, leaving Gaza in abeyance. Gen. James Jones, in his job as State Department envoy to the Israelis and Palestinians, was charged with determining a "security architecture" that would, in his view, make Israel secure enough to do that. He suggested a NATO contingent, possibly including American troops, and was irritated, it seems, that Israel didn't like his plan. One might assume he will take that plan to his new position as National Security Advisor to the President.

Short-circuiting the need for Palestinians and Israelis to make their own peace, allowing the Palestinians to bypass Israel and work with the United States, and substituting the U.S. view of "how much security" Israel needs for the Israeli government's view is the second-worst possible idea. Putting American soldiers in between Israelis and people who would kill them is the first-worst possible idea. No American - or NATO soldier - should stand on Israel's border to defend it, ever. Period.  

The UNIFIL experience, in which the force was supposed to help the Lebanese government fulfill its sovereign obligation to its own people, NOT protect Israel from Hezbollah, has increased the risk to Israel by providing Hezbollah a barrier behind which to restore its military capabilities. Despite the hopes of some that UNIFIL would actually help disarm Hezbollah, it does not and will not. It simply means that Israel has to calculate a European presence if it has to defend itself again from Hezbollah. The presence of the UN in Jenin and in Gaza has also given protection to Fatah and Hamas forces in their acquisition of military/terrorist capabilities. No American - or NATO - soldier - should stand where a terrorist army can form behind it, ever. Period.

It is clear that the incoming administration believes "solving" the "Palestinian problem" is a high priority. It wants to solve the wrong problem. The question is how to bring the Arab states and the Palestinians to verifiably accept the legitimacy to which Israel is entitled. The Palestinian state would follow close behind that. But if Israel's quest for legitimacy, which would bring it security without foreign forces, is denied, then Israel should be responsible for defending its people, and the Palestinians should understand that their aspirations for statehood will remain unfulfilled.  

Status quo - sadly sustainable.

Archive of past JINSA Reports

Support JINSA, click here!


email: feedback@jinsa.org
phone: 202-667-3900
web: http://www.jinsa.org

Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to davidlevy68.people@blogger.com by info@jinsa.org.
JINSA | 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 515 | Washington | DC | 20036

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

JINSA Report #836 Policy Principles: Part I (Israel-centrism)

JReports banner

JINSA Report #836
December 17, 2008
Policy Principles: Part I
(Israel-centrism)


The outline of the incoming Obama Administration's Middle East Policy is becoming clearer. It includes the belief that the "Palestinian-Israeli conflict" must be resolved in order to make progress on other, vital security issues.  

The President-elect said, "The lack of a resolution to this problem provides an excuse for anti-American militant jihadists to engage in inexcusable actions, and so we have a national-security interest in solving this, and I also believe that Israel has a security interest in solving this because I believe that the status quo is unsustainable."

This is the Israel-centric - though not necessarily anti-Israel - view. It hopes that fixing the "Israel problem" will result in less anti-American feeling in the Muslim world. It is nothing new - Presidents Bush 41 and 43 and Clinton tried it. But if "anti-American militant jihadists" are not on a rampage over Palestine (the President-elect called it "an excuse") to ignore the real sources of jihadism and its success in acquiring recruits puts an unjust burden on Israel and runs the risk of pressuring Israel to make dangerous security compromises in a vain attempt to buy quiet.  

And it lets America off the intellectual and political hook.  

Islamic jihad is about the belief that expansion of Islamic law and practice is the wave of the future. To that extent, it is a positive impulse - encouraging young men with little hope of success in the modern world to join a cause larger than them. It is popular in part because it is countercultural, making a virtue of hating what it cannot have and offering its rewards in the afterlife. It is popular in the region in part because it rails against corrupt and repressive regimes. The radical Islamic agenda that permeates European Muslim communities and prompted the NYPD (wisely and bravely) to study the roots of homegrown jihadism is anti-American and anti-Western because our political thinking is based on individual liberty and consensual, secular government. It is antithetical to the jihadist view of both individuals and government, and "anti" the many Muslims who take the more modern, individualist position.

"Anti-American militant jihadists" wage war against the West - and insufficiently compliant Muslims - for reasons that are unlikely to change either with our new President or with the creation of a small, corrupt state wedged between Jordan and Israel.  

The good news for the United States is that the Muslim world is not Israel-centric (although there is plenty of anti-Israel and old-fashioned anti-Semitic venom running through it). Recent overtures by Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States to Israel acknowledge that jihadists - particularly Shiite Persian ones - threaten them in ways Israel never did.  Jihadists, Sunni Arab ones, overplayed their hand in Iraq and turned the tide along with the "surge."

Defeating jihadist ideology will by no means be simple, but it would help to understand what it demands and know that a great many Muslims hope we will not write off the possibility of modern government in their part of the world. It would be a step backward for the new administration not to acknowledge that "anti American militant jihadism" is, at its core, religion/governance-centric, not Israel-centric.

Archive of past JINSA Reports

Support JINSA, click here!


email: feedback@jinsa.org
phone: 202-667-3900
web: http://www.jinsa.org

Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to davidlevy68.people@blogger.com by info@jinsa.org.
JINSA | 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 515 | Washington | DC | 20036

Friday, December 12, 2008

JINSA Report #835 "Peace is a Question of Will"

JReports banner

JINSA Report #835
December 12, 2008
"Peace is a Question of Will"

Accepting the Nobel Peace Prize, Finnish diplomat Martti Ahtisaari urged the Obama Administration to push hard on Palestinians and Israelis to "make peace," while carefully avoiding blaming either party. "The international community and those in power," he said, "are sitting there letting them destroy each other. They are allowing both parties to make their lives in the future even more complicated and difficult than it is today."

If you blame the nebulous "international community," you blame no one, which was probably the point.  

Ahtisaari continued, "Peace is a question of will. All conflicts can be settled and there are no excuses for allowing them to become eternal." If you suggest a solution that contains no mechanism for its implementation, no one can be blamed for not implementing it - which was probably the other point.  

Mushy thinking is the hallmark of the Nobel Committee and those upon whom the Committee bestows the award. But it is reasonable to consider both of Ahtisaari's points - that no conflict should be considered eternal, and that "will" can bring peace to a troubled spot.  

Conflicts do not have to be eternal. Britain, France and Germany fought many vicious wars; Germans killed six million Jews and uncounted others; more than 58,000 Americans and more than one million Vietnamese died in the Vietnam War(s, including the French war); an estimated 580,000 Japanese civilians were killed by the Allies in WWII. The amount of suffering that people endure during a war is not the determinant of whether civilized relations or even warm ones can ensue after it ends.   

But there must be a mechanism to settle the conflict to produce the peace - "will" is not sufficient. Machiavelli defined "peace" as the conditions imposed by the winner on the loser of the last war. It is the quality of those conditions that determines whether the ensuing "peace" is temporary, cold, warm or, perhaps, the peace of the dead. The peace imposed by the victors of World War I contained the seeds of World War II. The peace imposed after World War II worked well enough for the former Axis countries, but condemned Central Europe to another half century of despotism.  

It is offensive to think that Ahtisaari believes the Israeli people don't "want" peace enough. That if they "willed" it sufficiently, their children wouldn't have been blown up in Jerusalem buses and pizza parlors. Or perhaps President-elect Obama has to will it. Could he similarly will relief for Darfur and Zimbabwe? The "international community" has done little but "will" Africa's misery to end, and clearly that is insufficient.  

There is nothing inevitable or eternal about the problem of Palestinians and Israelis - but at this moment the two sides are not "willing" the same thing. Israel is under attack daily from the Palestinians, and Iran is calling for genocide.

Until that circumstance changes, all the "will" of the "international community" to "solve the problem" will more likely exacerbate the problem than resolve it.

Archive of past JINSA Reports

Support JINSA, click here!


email: feedback@jinsa.org
phone: 202-667-3900
web: http://www.jinsa.org

Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to davidlevy68.people@blogger.com by info@jinsa.org.
JINSA | 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 515 | Washington | DC | 20036

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

JINSA Report #834 Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mullen Honored by JINSA

JReports banner

JINSA Report #834
December 10, 2008
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mullen Honored by JINSA

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Michael Mullen was honored by JINSA on Monday, December 8, with the "Henry M. Jackson Distinguished Service Award."

Each year, JINSA honors leaders who, throughout their careers, have honored the tradition of the late Senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson. He inspired Americans with his dedication to a strong U.S. defense posture and his abiding interest in helping oppressed peoples. Most recent recipients of the organization's highest honor include Secretary Robert Gates in 2007, Senator John McCain in 2006 and Gen. Peter Pace, USMC, then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in 2005.

At the same event, six outstanding individuals from each branch of the U.S. military as well as the U.S. Special Operations Command were presented with the "Grateful Nation Award." The Grateful Nation Award, created by JINSA in 2003, recognizes individuals - mostly from the enlisted and noncommissioned officer ranks - who have distinguished themselves through superior conduct in the War on Terrorism since 9/11. The recipients are nominated by their commanding officers and chosen by the senior leadership of their respective services.

Below is the article on the event published by the Armed Forces Press Service on Dec. 9.



CJCS Salutes Servicemembers'
Success at Awards Dinner

by Gerry J. Gilmore
American Forces Press Service

2008 GNA Honorees

12/9/2008 - WASHINGTON (AFNS)  -- U.S. troops engaged in the global war on terrorism are doing "an exceptionally hard job exceptionally well," the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said at the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs' annual awards dinner held here Dec. 8.
 
"I believe our future is tied, as it always must be, to the young people who are in the fight right now," Navy Adm. Mike Mullen said. Mullen received the institute's Jackson award, named after the late U.S. Sen. Henry M. Jackson, a staunch supporter of America's friendship with Israel. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates received the Jackson award last year.

Senior U.S. civilian and military leaders are focused on "driving hard for final success in Iraq [and] turning it around in Afghanistan," Admiral Mullen said.

At the same time, defense leaders remain committed to supporting the military families "of those who have borne the battle," Admiral Mullen said, noting he is working to provide more time at home for troops between duty assignments in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The U.S. military also is focused on providing "a lifetime of care to the wounded and the families of the fallen," he said.

Today's generation of soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and Coast Guardsmen want "leaders who will listen" and "challenging assignments of value, learning and building on the satisfaction that they've achieved by doing an exceptionally hard job exceptionally well," the chairman said.

Servicemembers who have fought in Afghanistan and Iraq also want to lead, Admiral Mullen said, noting they've been shaped by experiences different from those encountered during his service as a young officer during the Vietnam War and the subsequent military cutbacks in the 1970s.

Today's troops have achieved great success in Iraq and Afghanistan, Admiral Mullen said, and they "are truly appreciated and trusted by the American public."

As the war in Iraq winds down, U.S. servicemembers will experience "the prospect of a long, tough duty ahead, as we turn our full attention to the hills of Afghanistan, as we must," Admiral Mullen said.

The war against terror isn't over, Admiral Mullen said, citing the Nov. 26 terrorist attacks on Mumbai, India. The four-star admiral recently returned from a visit to Pakistan - believed to be where the Mumbai attackers made their plans -- where he encouraged senior Pakistani leaders to take a firmer role in confronting militant extremists operating in their country.

"We are working to prevent Nov. 26 from becoming a tipping point towards chaos in the region, by confronting once again a common enemy," Admiral Mullen said. "Both India and Pakistan are increasingly targeted by terror, just as we have been, and the futures of these nations are bonded, just as our future is with theirs."

Investigations of the Mumbai attacks indicate a new level of terrorist sophistication, Admiral Mullen said, noting the attackers employed global positioning systems and satellite phones while committing mayhem that killed more than 200 people.

"This is an evil in the sight of our world, and the only way to face it is to face it with united determination, with every aspect of our influence and power, and with all possible urgency," Admiral Mullen said. "This wasn't just an attack on Indians, or Americans or Brits or even Jews; it was, rather, an attack on all of us who love the sacred dignity of human life."

As the war against terrorism continues, it's time to prepare young military leaders for greater responsibilities and higher rank as part of "their turn at the tiller of history, for they've earned it," Admiral Mullen said.

Military-support groups, such as JINSA, help foster closer civilian understanding of national security matters "and unite us in common purpose, thought and deed," he said.

Earlier in the evening, Admiral Mullen saluted six servicemembers who received the institute's 2008 Grateful Nation award for outstanding service during the war on terrorism. The awardees are:
  • Air Force Master Sgt. Edward A. Tillman III;
  • Air Force Staff Sgt. Zachary J. Rhyner;
  • Army Sgt. Monica L. Brown;
  • Marine Staff Sgt. Phillip J. Anderson;
  • Navy Senior Chief Petty Officer Douglas Day; and
  • Coast Guard Lt. Cmdr. Eric S. Bernstein.
The six military awardees are "very, very special people," Admiral Mullen said. They were selected by their service branches.

"They represent the best military that I have been associated with in the over four decades that I've had the privilege to serve," Admiral Mullen said of the awardees.

Sergeant Brown, a combat medic who earned the Silver Star for gallantry during action against enemy forces in Afghanistan in 2007, said she feels honored to receive the Grateful Nation award.

"There's a lot of history behind this organization," Sergeant Brown said of JINSA's long-time support on behalf of servicemembers and the U.S. military. Therefore, being a recipient of the institute's Grateful Nation award "means a lot to me," she added.

Archive of past JINSA Reports

Support JINSA, click here!


email: feedback@jinsa.org
phone: 202-667-3900
web: http://www.jinsa.org

Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to davidlevy68.people@blogger.com by info@jinsa.org.
JINSA | 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 515 | Washington | DC | 20036

Wednesday, December 03, 2008

JINSA Report #833 Political Reconciliation

JReports banner

JINSA Report #833
December 3, 2008
Political Reconciliation

In the horror of Mumbai, a very important moment was overlooked - the Iraqi Parliament passed the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) negotiated with the United States. We have concerns about the document, but as coalition politics, it was extraordinary. It may also be the world's best hope for convincing millions of people that consensual government beats violent Islamic radicalism as a form of government.

Skeptics say planning for the American departure is the only thing that actually unites Sunni, Shiite and Kurdish factions; they don't want us there. News flash - we don't want to be there. We'll vote for getting out as fast as they will vote for throwing us out.

Two-and-a-half years ago, when the Iraqi parliament took office, we wrote:

"Under fire" is probably the worst condition under which to begin practicing consensual politics, but the new government very quickly has to convince the people that the government is the source of their protection and the address for the redress of legitimate grievances. Citizens have to be convinced to end their support for militias and terrorists by a combination of government strength in counter-terror, equality in application of the law, and the uncorrupt provision of security and services in the middle of a war.

It is a tall order. Can it fail? You bet. Will it fail? Hedge.

Thus far, punditry has considered it axiomatic that nothing political could go right in Iraq... Punditry was wrong because it underestimated two things: the bravery of the Iraqi people and the willingness of stubborn American leadership and spectacular American soldiers to provide time and space for Iraqi political development. The first is self-protective and must persist. The second is based on the understanding that Iraq is a front in the larger war against terrorists and the states that harbor and support them, but the physical manifestation of that understanding cannot remain in Iraq forever.

We and the Iraqi government have come a long way in that time. The "self-protective" part has kicked in for them. Beneath the nationalist bravado-verging-on-anti-Americanism is the recognition that whatever they have is tenuous and the only one everyone can turn is to us - and they do. The American presence at once allows them a place to focus their irritation over their unsettled status and keeps the irritation from degenerating into open warfare again. They, and we, agree that we are necessary.  

On the American side, the conversation is about the same - if you took a vote in the incoming and outgoing administrations and in Congress, no one wants to be in Iraq. No one has ever wanted to be in Iraq, but fortunately for the future of the Iraqi people, the outgoing administration (with glaring and ugly Democratic exceptions in Congress) stayed through the worst and proved that Americans don't quit in the middle and don't (always) cut out on their allies. The incoming administration has been very circumspect about the circumstances under which we will now leave, how we will do it and what we plan to leave behind.

We are closer to the time when the "physical manifestation of our understanding" - our soldiers, our children - will be able to come home.

Archive of past JINSA Reports

Support JINSA, click here!


email: feedback@jinsa.org
phone: 202-667-3900
web: http://www.jinsa.org

Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to davidlevy68.people@blogger.com by info@jinsa.org.
JINSA | 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 515 | Washington | DC | 20036

Tuesday, December 02, 2008

JINSA Report #832 Killers From The Swamp

JReports banner

JINSA Report #832
December 2, 2008
Killers From The Swamp

The terrorist attacks in Mumbai were extraordinarily well planned: it took a year, the experts said. Selecting and training the right people; getting them to the target; having ammunition (and accomplices?) in place; diversionary attacks; and then the main strikes on two Western-oriented targets. They let some Turkish people go, and an Italian, keeping the British and Americans. They were not suicide bombers - they intended to live as long as they could to kill as many people as they could.

And amid the yearlong operation, they found and cased the Chabad House. Jews constitute an estimated 0.03 percent of the population of Mumbai, but these guys took the time to find and kill the Jews. [And who are those Western journalists calling Chabad "missionaries"? They are not, but if they were, would that make a difference?]

We will hear more about who and what and why, but if you want to know who did it, it was the killers from the swamp. Whether al Qaeda or al Qaeda-wannabes, whether British-born Pakistanis (there is evidence that some were) or Pakistani-born-Pakistanis or Indians, whether trained in Pakistan or Afghanistan or Iran, there are people who work around the world to bend the minds of young men (women are in the closet) to kill on behalf of radical Muslim ideology that has as its enemies Jews, Hindus, the West (including but not only Christianity), modernity in all its forms including democratic thinking and the rights of women.

The Australian newspaper reported that the surviving terrorist said they were sent on their mission after listening to, "provocative speeches by Hafiz Mohammed Saeed... Saeed, described as [terrorist organization Lashkar e-Taibe]'s supreme religious and political head, declared in one speech: 'The only language India understands is that of force, and that is the language it must be talked to in.'" The Australian cited terror analyst Praveen Swami who has followed Saeed. "India, [Saeed] claimed, was 'building dams in Jammu and Kashmir to choke Pakistan's water supplies and cripple its agriculture.'" According to Swami, Saeed told his followers that India had "made a deal with the United States to send 150,000 Indian troops to Afghanistan" and that it agreed to support the U.S. in its existential war against Islam. In Lahore at the end of October, Swami said, "Saeed proclaimed that there was an 'ongoing war in the world between Islam and its enemies.'" "He claimed that 'crusaders of the East and West have united in a cohesive onslaught against Muslims,'"

None are real; all are easily believed by the easily led.

We are reminded that in July, the NYPD published a report about the potential for homegrown terrorism in the United States and for the radicalization of segments of the American Muslim population. They were most concerned about the use of the Internet to spread radical ideology in private, along with local radical leaders who could find susceptible young people to send abroad to be steeped in the ideology of the swamp.

Mumbai was not about politics or political grievances. It was about carefully honed hatred coupled with the means to kill. And that is what we in the progressive world - including and particularly the progressive Muslim world - have to worry about. Hatred taught and nurtured.

Archive of past JINSA Reports

Support JINSA, click here!


email: feedback@jinsa.org
phone: 202-667-3900
web: http://www.jinsa.org

Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to davidlevy68.people@blogger.com by info@jinsa.org.
JINSA | 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 515 | Washington | DC | 20036