JINSA Report #572 Israel's "Right to Exist" and American Interests

JINSA
1779 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Suite 515
Washington, DC 20036

202-667-3900
202-667-0601 Fax

May 19, 2006

JINSA Report #572

Israel's "Right to Exist" and American Interests

1. A Congressman said, "I believe it would be in the United States and
Israel's best interest not to allow Hamas to gain more land in the West
Bank until they give an ironclad guarantee to stop the violence and
fully recognize and respect the State of Israel's right to exist."

2. An administration official, responding to a question about how one
would know Hamas was serious if, indeed, it did claim to have recognized
the right of Israel to exist, said, "Frankly, we had expected them
already to have tried that; we're surprised that they haven't." The
implication was that the administration would be skeptical of any such
claim.

The phrase Israel's "right to exist," is offensive. Israel's rights in
the international community were determined by the United Nations in
1948 under the same post-colonial and then post-WWII framework used by
dozens of countries. They are not subject to post hoc review.

The requirement for the Palestinians - not just Hamas - to claim
American support for Palestinian statehood should instead be,
"Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and
acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political
independence of Israel and its right to live in peace within secure and
recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force."

If that sounds a lot like UN Resolution 242, there is a reason. It is
that to which Israel is entitled and that which the Palestinians -
should they ever meet the requirements for statehood - will want to
claim as well.

Rumors abound in Washington this week about the tone and the substance
of Prime Minister Olmert's upcoming visit: the U.S. will - or won't -
support further "disengagement"; PM Olmert will - or won't - agree to
talk to Abu Mazen; he will - or won't - ask for American financial
and/or security help; the U.S. will - or won't - complain about Israel's
security fence and defense. We suggest a modest beginning.

The President should remember that he is listening to the democratically
elected representative of our friend and ally Israel, which upholds the
values we uphold and fights the war we fight. Hamas is not a Palestinian
nationalist organization and it fights for a program larger than
Palestinian statehood. That larger program threatens us.

The Prime Minister should remember that Oslo's flaw was believing
momentum from small steps could result in a leap across the chasm of
Palestinian non-recognition of the legitimacy of Israeli sovereignty.
Unilateral withdrawal from additional territory will leave a political
as well as military vacuum to be filled by those same internationalist
groups that threaten America's regional interests.

Don't talk about anyone's "right to exist," but how best to ensure that
forward-looking governments, including Jordan, continue to exist in the
Middle East.

To view this JINSA Report online click on the link below.
http://www.jinsa.org/JINSAReports/3407

___________________________________________________
Have a comment on this JINSA Report? Send an email to feedback@jinsa.org to let us know.

Access past JINSA Reports at: http://www.jinsa.org/

If you would like to receive JINSA Reports by e-mail, please sign up online at
http://www.jinsa.org/lists/subscribe.html

To be removed from JINSA Reports distribution list, please go to the following page on the JINSA website
http://www.jinsa.org/lists/unsubscribe.html

If you would like to support JINSA, please click on the following link
http://www.jinsa.org/member/member.html