Watching PR traffic from selected sources

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

JINSA Report #857 Go Israel

JReports banner

JINSA Report #857
February 11, 2009
Go Israel
  • A-Sharq Al-Awsat London's pan-Arab daily wrote, "Israeli elections: Between the Right and the extreme Right."
  • The Palestinian Al-Quds opined, "We're witnessing the Israeli rivals in the election campaign outbidding each other in ultra-extremism, as a way to gain more votes. Israeli society has turned more extreme, and moved much further from peace and its obligations."
  • Time magazine screamed, "Israel Election Dashes Hopes for Peace."

Not really. The close split between Kadima and Likud (early results without soldier ballots) may indicate that the Israeli public has coalesced toward the center, which even Time admits - but worries that the "mutual antagonism of both leaders" (the mutual antagonism of one of them wouldn't have been interesting) which "makes an accommodation all but impossible." Like, say, campaign antagonism between Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama?

But, for the sake of argument, what if the Israeli public has really moved one or two or more steps to the right? What then? Perhaps the pundits should consider what made them move and how to move them back, if back is where they need to go.

Israel is, after all, a democracy; a multiparty, open system with a free press and an informed electorate. The Israeli public has a voice and knows how to use it. Who influences it and how?

Israelis listen not only to their own leadership, but also to that of Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria and Iran - and watch what they do to threaten Israel and to poison their own people.  Israelis listen to public demands by Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Oman and Bahrain - and know they all admit in private that they want Israel on their side against Iran. Israelis listen to the EU, the United States and the Quartet - and read the Oslo Accords, Gaza-Jericho, Oslo II, the Wye River and Hebron agreements, Taba and the Road Map, and wonder why asymmetrical paper agreements that require Israel to provide tangible benefits to the Palestinians in exchange for promises of security for Israel have not resulted in security for Israel.  

And they become skeptical of more talk and more hard concessions in exchange for empty promises. Skepticism is reasonable. Perhaps Palestinian "[t]ermination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force," would incline Israelis to take a more "dovish" approach.  

Interestingly, while clearly discouraged on the "peace front," Israelis appear not to have become skeptical of the importance of actually BEING one of only two countries in the region that can claim free, open, non-coercive multiparty elections (and one of them hasn't been at it very long).  

Israel has not spent a single day, a single moment, in peace with its neighbors. Israel has not had a single day or a single moment in which it was not threatened with extinction - Iran is only the latest existential threat; in 1967, the rabbis were talking seriously about religious rituals that would be observed if Israel was forced to use the mass graves it was preparing for its citizens.

Under the circumstances, the Israeli public - center right or center left as the vote falls - deserve a cheer from small-d democrats around the world for another peaceful exercise of a precious franchise.
Archive of past JINSA Reports

Support JINSA, click here!


email: feedback@jinsa.org
phone: 202-667-3900
web: http://www.jinsa.org

Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to davidlevy68.people@blogger.com by info@jinsa.org.
JINSA | 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 515 | Washington | DC | 20036

Friday, February 06, 2009

Email Owner

EURO MILLIONS ESPANA LOTTERY COMMISSION
FROM THE DESK OF THE VICE PRESIDENT
INTERNATIONAL PROMOTIONS / PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT
C/BRAVO MURILLO 134- 2, E ,
28020, MADRID,SPAIN


Email owner,

The International Promotion Department Euro Million Intl,congratulate you
as one
of the 3 LUCKY EMAIL STAR prize winner in the ELP program.This notice will
come
to you as a suprise,The results of the 2008 electronic online email
sweepstakes
is out,and your email ID won (700,000.00 euro) in the category A, attached to
Qualification (AL/039/BT).

This is a random Computer Game in which all participants were selected
through a
ballot system drawn from over 500,000 companies and 10,000,000 Individual
email
IDs from all over the world.It is a program aimed at encouraging Internet
users
hence no ticket sold. We request you pay attention to this notice and
follow,the
procedures to claim your prize.Call and email your Qualification number,full
names,phone number,mobile,occupation and contact address to the paying
finance
agent below.

Dr.Roberto Lopez .
Tel:+34 618-125-559
madrid,Spain
Email to: robertolopez2009@googlemail.com

Visit (www.euromillions.com) for more informations.We
wish you the best of luck as you spend your good fortune.

Sincerely,
Mrs.Rico Mario.
Promotion Manger.

URGENT BUSINESS PROPOSAL FOR YOU, FROM HONG KONG!!!!

Greetings!

URGENT BUSINESS PROPOSAL FOR YOU, FROM HONG KONG!!!!

It is understandable that you might be a little bit apprehensive because you do
not know me, Please forgive this unusual manner to contact you, but this
particular letter/email is of exceptional and very private nature,as by virtue
of my vantage position in Hang Seng Bank Ltd -Hong Kong i have a lucrative
business proposal of mutual interest to share with you.There is no way for me to
know whether I will be properly understood, but it is my duty to write and reach
out to you,TRUSTING that you will give this proposal a positive consideration.I
am Mr.Peter Lee a South Korean,56 years old and happily married with grown-up
children, and i am an Executive Director of Hang Seng Bank Ltd,in charge of the
International Remittance department.I will need you to assist me in executing a
business project from our bank worth US$25.5 Million.These funds were deposited
with our bank by a customer of our bank who is a national{citizen} of your
country,who unfortunately died in the December 2004 Asia Tsunami disaster.
For more on this natural disaster click on these links:-

http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/newsid_4530000/newsid_4537600/4537601.stm
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/02/19/tsunami.bush.clinton/index.html
http://www.smh.com.au/news/Asia-Tsunami/Tsunami-survivors-face-disease-starvation/2004/12/28/1103996558253.html
http://www.globalsecurity.org/eye/andaman-us.htm

The deceased account has been declared dormants since 2006 and these funds will
be confiscated/declared unserviceable and turned over to the Hong Kong
government if the deceased business associates or next-of-kin did not claim this
money;since all efforts to trace any living relative of the deceased proved
abortive,i have decided that i will have you claim this money as the deceased
business associate/or next-of-kin,since you are from the same country and
perhaps have some similarities in certain areas.Everything concerning this
transaction shall be LEGALLY done without hitch,as i was the deceased account
Officer and all the relevant documents of this deposit were kept under my
care.Please endeavour to observe utmost discretion in all matters concerning
this issue,as i hope that you are a sincere,honest,matured person and above all
TRUSTWORTHY.Once the funds have been successfully transferred into your account,
we shall share it in a ratio of 30% for you,65% for me and my assocaites in the bank
and the reminder 5% to take care of contingencies.I will prefer you reach me on my
private email address below:{ peterlee0111@gmail.com ) and finally after that
I shall furnish you with more information about this operation.I am counting on
your anticipated co-operation for a successful and hitch free business transaction
between us,that will be mutually beneficial,for a start oblige me these information:-

1.Your Full name{s}:-
2.Current contact address:-
3.Your present Occupation:-
4.Your age:-
5.Contact phone numbers{Office and Mobile{cell}:-

Please if you are not interested delete this email and do not hurt me because I
am putting my career and the life of my family at stake with this
venture.Although nothing ventured is nothing gained,as it is said,the taste of
the pudding is in the eating,do give this proposal SERIOUS AND POSITIVE
CONSIDERATION.Your earliest response to this letter will be highly appreciated.

Kind Regards,

Mr.Peter Lee

Hang Seng Bank Limited
Hong Kong.{Asia}

Email:- peterlee0111@gmail.com


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Find the home of your dreams with eircom net property
Sign up for email alerts now http://www.eircom.net/propertyalerts

Thursday, February 05, 2009

JINSA Report #856 Erdogan at Davos

JReports banner

JINSA Report #856
February 5, 2009
Erdogan at Davos

The situation in Turkey is going from bad to worse.

Last week at Davos, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan showed his true colors when he barged out of a meeting with UN General Secretary Ban Ki-moon, Arab League head Amr Musa and Israel's President Shimon Peres.

The incident occurred after Shimon Peres presented Israel's position on Gaza in response to Erdogan's practically hysterical diatribe against Israel.

"When it comes to killing you know well how to kill," Erdogan yelled at Peres, a Noble Peace Prize recipient. For the past several weeks Erdogan had been mounting an anti-Israel campaign so vicious that it fostered a convulsion of the vilest anti-Semitism directed at the Turkish Jewish community ever seen in that country.

Why did this happen now? Erdogan's handlers would claim that the casualties in Gaza moved him, but the prime minister was also aware of the thousands of Hamas rockets and mortar bombs Israel endured for months without response. Nobody needs to explain to the Turks what it means to be a constant target of terrorism. Nobody needs to explain to the Turks the necessity of being unyielding in their response to terrorism. They wrote the book on it.

So why did Turkey take this anti-Israel turn now?

The Turkish press reported that it was Erdogan who requested the Davos panel suggesting that the dramatics were premeditated. Observers note that electioneering had already begun in anticipation of the March 29 municipal elections in Turkey.

Ever since his election in 2003, it has been Erdogan's intention to steer Turkey away from Kemalism and hurl the country back to its Ottoman glories.

Erdogan also learned from the mistakes of the earlier failed Islamist Welfare Party government of Necmettin Erbakan. Erbakan tried to implement his Islamist reforms too quickly and was forced out by the Turkish military in 1997.

A shrewd politician, Erdogan learned two lessons from Erbakan's ouster. The first was that change would have to be gradual. The second was that the military would have to be neutralized.

In both he has succeeded.

What the world saw at Davos was an Erdogan confident enough in his consolidation of power to act.

Erdogan's two weeks of hostility to Israel, Turkey's stalwart friend and trading partner, served notice that he was putting himself and his country on the side of Iran, Syria and Hamas against the more pro-Western Egypt and Saudi Arabia. And how better to consolidate his vision than to stir up hatred against one of Turkey's most modern Kemalist elements - the Jews?
Archive of past JINSA Reports

Support JINSA, click here!


email: feedback@jinsa.org
phone: 202-667-3900
web: http://www.jinsa.org

Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to davidlevy68.people@blogger.com by info@jinsa.org.
JINSA | 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 515 | Washington | DC | 20036

Wednesday, February 04, 2009

JINSA Report #855 Creating Countries at the ICC

JReports banner

JINSA Report #855
February 4, 2009
Creating Countries at the ICC

In 2002, JINSA opposed the creation of the International Criminal Court (ICC). (JINSA Reports #265 & #266). The ICC is not required to provide Americans the basic legal protections guaranteed to us by our Constitution, and has nebulous political goals including "to achieve justice for all," and "to end impunity (of national leaders)." We called it a "playground for mischief" and "UN groupthink," and said Israel and the United States would be the primary targets of its political judges.  

But a few weeks ago, we found ourselves citing ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo on the doctrine of proportionality:

The death of civilians during an armed conflict, no matter how grave and regrettable, does not in itself constitute a war crime. International humanitarian law and the Rome Statute permit belligerents to carry out proportionate attacks against military objectives, even when it is known that some civilian deaths or injuries will occur. [Military objectives are] those which by their nature, location, purpose or use make an effective contribution to military action and whose total or partial destruction, capture or neutralization, in the circumstances ruling at the time, offers definite military advantage.

Forbidden, he wrote, would be:

An intentional attack directed against civilians or an attack launched on a military objective in the knowledge that the incidental civilian injuries would be clearly excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage... (or) intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects... clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated.

Israel met the first condition; Hamas the second. And since Moreno-Ocampo wasn't writing about Israel and Gaza, we thought we were safe citing him. We should have known better.

Having first said the ICC had no jurisdiction over Israel (which, like the United States, is not a signatory to the treaty that established the court), Moreno-Ocampo told The Times (UK) that he is considering "the case for Palestinian jurisdiction over alleged crimes committed in Gaza." Palestinian groups say Gaza is a de facto state, despite its lack of recognized status. Moreno-Ocampo has agreed to make a finding of status to sue.  

If he makes "Palestine" a country, will he also snap his fingers and end the Hamas-Fatah civil war? Otherwise, how will he decide who gets to exercise the new status? It matters in part because Fatah has just accused Hamas of war crimes, publishing a list of people killed, maimed, beaten or tortured BY HAMAS in Gaza. The Palestinian news agency Ma'an cites a senior official saying Fatah is responsible for, "initiating the proper legal procedures against those responsible for the crimes and anyone who gave the directives for murder or torture. These people must be brought to justice."

In the International Criminal Court?  

The ability of the ICC to make legal trouble is clear. If it arrogates to itself the ability to create countries (or un-create them if it believes Palestine is entitled to the space occupied by Israel) we fear no one will put the breaks on internationalism run amok.

Archive of past JINSA Reports

Support JINSA, click here!


email: feedback@jinsa.org
phone: 202-667-3900
web: http://www.jinsa.org

Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to davidlevy68.people@blogger.com by info@jinsa.org.
JINSA | 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 515 | Washington | DC | 20036

Tuesday, February 03, 2009

JINSA Report #854 Israel Did NOT Hit An UNRWA School In Gaza

JReports banner

JINSA Report #854
February 3, 2009
Israel Did NOT Hit An UNRWA School In Gaza

That needs to be the headline somewhere, and we were sure it wouldn't be in the New York Times or The Washington Post. The story itself bears scrutiny; not least because the International Criminal Court is trying to figure out how to make "Palestine" a "country" to give it status to sue Israel for war crimes (more on that later).

The first thing we know is that Israel's operation in Gaza was a response to continuing Hamas fire directed at Israeli civilians - a Palestinian war crime. During the operation, an Israeli bomb hit a street near an UNRWA school and a large number of people were killed. We also know that Hamas put its explosives, mortars and rocket launchers amid the civilian population, inside mosques and under civilian buildings. To understand the ubiquity of this second Palestinian war crime (there are others), go to The Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center (www.terrorism-info.org.il) and find the report, "Using the Civilian Population of the Gaza Strip as Human Shields: Aerial photographs show the location of terrorist bases and weapons in the heart of the Gaza Strip."

Enlarge the pictures until you can really see the tentacles they wrapped around the people, making them human shields (yet another war crime).

Palestinians are no longer reticent to explain. One man told The Washington Post his family lived next door to a soccer field from which Hamas fired at Israel, but he thought the Israelis wouldn't hit his building. "They can tell the difference between a rocket launcher and an apartment." His confidence is touching, if naive. John Ging, UNRWA's operations director in Gaza, is not naïve; he is complicit. He knows Israel didn't hit the school, but he makes it Israel's fault.

"I never said anyone was killed in the school. Our officials never made any such allegation. (This is patently untrue; an official UN report three days after the attack said, "Israeli shelling directly hit two UNRWA schools.")  I know no one was killed in the school," Ging told The Jerusalem Post. "But 41 innocent people were killed in the street outside the school. Many of those people had taken refuge in the school and wandered out onto the street. The State of Israel still has to answer for that. What did they know and what care did they take?"

What did Israel know? Is Ging suggesting that Israel deliberately dropped a bomb on a street full of civilians? Israel warned Palestinians in Arabic before they attacked, urged them to take shelter or leave the area. Oh, right, they DID take shelter - in the school - according to Ging. The school Israel DIDN'T hit. Question for Ging: why were they "wandering" on the street and how does he know they were "innocent"? Maybe they weren't and maybe they weren't civilians, either. See the outstanding report by Steven Stotsky for CAMERA, analyzing casualty figures from Palestinian sources to conclude that males, aged 15-40 (prime combatant age for Hamas, but violating the Geneva Convention on Child Soldiers), were heavily overrepresented on casualty lists.

What care did Israel take? Israel didn't hit the school.

But that won't help when politically motivated prosecutors at the political International Criminal Court get ready to strike.

Archive of past JINSA Reports

Support JINSA, click here!


email: feedback@jinsa.org
phone: 202-667-3900
web: http://www.jinsa.org

Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to davidlevy68.people@blogger.com by info@jinsa.org.
JINSA | 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 515 | Washington | DC | 20036

Monday, February 02, 2009

From:Madam Laarni Ejarcito Enriquez.

From:Madam Laarni Ejarcito Enriquez.
Confinement house. Manilla, Phillipine.
WITH TRUST AND CONFIDENCE,
Dear Sir,
I am very sorry to had infringe into your privacy without permissionbut
please with all humility i solicit your attention to hear me
out.Iammadam Laarni Enriquez, a filippino by nationality, and a
divorcee. Honestly I would like to have a long lasting relationship with
you ,if possible entrusting my life time fortune into your possession,as
now I am broken hearted and needs someone to trust, without remembering
mypast and forsaken experiences from close confidants and family. I need
someone, who would take me for whom I am and as a life timepartner,
after making claims of my deposited life fortuned in Abroad.Well, from
your profile, I believe in me that you ought to be a veryhonest person.
I would like to give you a brief description of my lifeautobiograph I
was once the mistress of our President, Joseph Estrada,andduring his
tenure in office, I was often used as a courier indepositinghis(the
president) funds, in the Europe,and Africa because of myhonesty but his
wife Madam Loi and her son-Jude, accused me of havingsecretaffair with
the president ,this led to fabrication of all kind ofallegation against
just to disrepute my honestly earned fame .

But, not quite long, I was arrested, together with his wife and son,in
connection with the 27th July, 2003, failed coup for working in
thehousehold of the ex-president Joseph Estrada .Althought i was
latergranted bailed as there was no substantial evidence against me ,
now Ihave been released but under security watch within state
confinementwithlimited opportunity to reach the outside world to prove
my innocence. All, I want from you is to assist me make claims of some
funds, I diddeposited in metallic truck box in security finance house in
London,United Kingdom a remote states in British. Every other deposit
havebeenconsficated and seized by the the government of Madam Gloria
thePresident of republic of philippine .
But, this one is the only one theycouldnot see, as I did kept the
deposit certicate and deposit agreetmentwith one of my close confidant
The Amount being deposited is much about 20. Million United
statesdollars,as this was the money that was supposed to be used by
thePresident to acquire some properties in Europe.
All, I want from you, now is honesty and sincerity, as, as soon asthis
money is claimed by you, I will look for a way out and sneaked outof
Philippines and travel down to meet you in your country , theshipment
cost and demurrage has being taken care I would like us to goinvestment
partnership together,in investing this money in your countryandanywhere
else you prefer.
I will send you my Photo, the a depositcertificate and authoritative
agreetment which i am prapared to forward to youwith more hint on how to
reach the security company to retrieve andrequest the shipment of the
metallic box containing fund on my behalftoyour country while i join you
at convenient time for joint investmentif you desire.In addition to this
i promise to give you five millionunited states dollars out of the total
fund for your kind assistance.
Sincerely,
Laarni.
 
Email: harjohns12@yahoo.com

AOL Email goes Mobile! You can now read your AOL Emails whilst on the move. Sign up for a free AOL Email account with unlimited storage today.

Saturday, January 31, 2009

Congratulation!!!

Attn: Winner,

We are pleased to inform you of the result of the LOTERIA DE NAVIDA PROGRAM held on the 22nd DEC 2008. www.loterias.interbusca.com

Your names attached to a ticket number 78400 won the lottery in the 2nd ''premio'' (category) in the 11:11 hours of the 22nd of December 2008.

You have therefore been approved for a lump sum payout of Ђ 1,000.000.00 (ONE MILLION EURO ONLY) in cash credited to the file reference number: ESP/0022/120/08M. This is from a total cash prize of Ђ25,468,770.00 (TWENTY FIVE MILLION FOUR HUNDRED AND SIXTY EIGHT THOUSAND, SEVEN HUNDRED AND SEVENTY EURO ONLY) shared among the international winners in all categories. CONGRATULATIONS!!!

!!HOW TO CLAIM YOUR PRIZE!!

Simply contact our Fiduciary Agent with the following particulars which are attached to your payment order:

(i) Ticket Nє: 78400
(ii) (ii) Ref Nє: ESP/0022/120/08M.

Contact person:

Jose Miguel Alonso.
Tel: + 34-634 143 801
Email: globalsgrs@gmail.com

Friday, January 30, 2009

JINSA Report #853 "The Choice Is Ours"

JReports banner

JINSA Report #853
January 30, 2009
"The Choice Is Ours"

"The choice is ours," is the loose translation in The Washington Post of a comment made in Baghdad before Saturday's vote. More than 15 million Iraqis will choose from 14,400 candidates on 400 lists for 440 seats on provincial councils. The Post story interviews several people ready to take possession of their fractious country (at least in 14 of 18 provinces) and notes that "elections have now won an enthusiastic if grudging fealty, emerging as a true arena for contest in which nearly every sect, ethnicity and tribe in the country has staked its future." Says one Baghdadi, "My sense and the sense of people I talk to is that if they don't vote, then they're responsible for a situation that stays bad."

What more could small-d democrats ask?

The Post, one of the most important newspapers in the United States, has finally acknowledged that in the secure space the U.S.-led surge has produced, the Iraqi people have agreed that voting beats killing. The story even acknowledges what promoters of democracy have always known, that in an open political system, alliances will change and coalitions will emerge. A Sunni politician said, "Everyone knows the political map will change, definitely. Everyone is waiting to see the results to rearrange their papers and to set up their alliances for the next elections."

It's a good thing didn't listen when Harry Reid said the war was lost. Or when then-candidate, now-President Obama said the surge had failed. Even now, The Post hedges - "In some ways, (elections) have revealed a landscape perhaps more precarious than the one the United States inherited in 2003." 

Certainly there remains in Iraq sectarian problems and elections are not a panacea - in fact, three Sunni candidates were assassinated this week, which probably shows the fear of those unwilling to present themselves to the public for a vote. But even at that, it is hard to imagine how freely contested elections make a country more precarious than Saddam's torture rooms, mass graves and the poison gas he used against the Kurds and the Shiite Marsh Arabs.  

Dictators definitely present the advantage of a single address for all issues, but that is an advantage that accrues only to outsiders, not to the people who have to live under them.  It is hard to imagine that Iraqis would trade their messy, fractious but free and competitive elections for a return to the terror of Saddam.

Slipping a look across Iraq's border to Iran, where a clique rather than a single person runs the dictatorship, one wonders how the Iranian people understand the burgeoning freedom of their neighbor next door. Or whether people ruled by Bashar Assad, Hosni Mubarak, Moammar Qaddafi or the corrupt cadres of Hamas, Hezbollah or Fatah wonder what it would take to produce clean, open, multiparty elections in their prisons.

We are reminded of the question put to Benjamin Franklin, "Well, Doctor, what have we got - a Republic or a Monarchy?" To which Dr. Franklin replied,  "A Republic, if you can keep it." The Iraqis will have to work hard to keep their new system, and they still need American support, but they have proven they can build a system to keep.

Archive of past JINSA Reports

Support JINSA, click here!


email: feedback@jinsa.org
phone: 202-667-3900
web: http://www.jinsa.org

Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to davidlevy68.people@blogger.com by info@jinsa.org.
JINSA | 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 515 | Washington | DC | 20036

Thursday, January 29, 2009

January 2008 JINSA Newsletter

JINSA Logo- Blue
JINSA News
  January 2009
In This Issue
Israeli Operations in Gaza
JINSA Accuses Iran of Facilitating Hamas Rockets
Annual Award Dinner Photo Gallery
Neumann Op-Ed Appears in Chicago Tribune
JINSA Protests Anti-Semitism in Turkey
Bryen Appears on "Steel on Steel"

Save the Date March 26, 2009

JINSA will hold a one day conference entitled:

"Slipping Under the Radar:
Emerging Security Issues for the Obama Administration"

Click here to download the save the date card


  New LEEP Information Page with Video

Click here to visit the new LEEP information page
Analyses of Israeli Operations in Gaza

The first article discusses how operations in Gaza provide an opportunity to review Israeli doctrine in the West Bank and Lebanon as a means of assessing Israel's overall security operations.

Click here to read the article

In another article, JINSA discusses the concept of proportionality in international law and how it applies to Israel's retaliation to Hamas rocket attacks.

Click here to read the article

JINSA and Major Organizations Protest Anti-Semitism to Turkish PM

JINSA and four other major Jewish organizations sent a letter to the Prime Minister Erdogan on January 21, 2009 expressing concern over the current wave of anti-Semitic manifestations in Turkey.

Click here to read the letter

Op-Ed by JINSA Executive Director Tom Neumann Appears in the Chicago Tribune

In an op-ed in the Chicago Tribune on January 25, 2009, JINSA Executive Director Tom Neumann makes the case that anti-Israel attitudes do not fall into a pattern of normal political hostility of the type directed toward other countries.

Click here to read the op-ed

2008 Jackson Award/Grateful Nation Award Photo Gallery

Click here to view the gallery

JINSA Accuses Iran of Facilitating
Rocket Attacks

At the beginning of Operation Cast Lead, JINSA spoke out about Israel's retaliation after all other means were exhausted.

Click here to read the press release

Shoshana Bryen on the "Steel on Steel" Radio Program

Shoshana Bryen, JINSA's Senior Director of Security Policy, discussed Middle East policy under the Obama Administration on the weekly radio show "Steel on Steel." "Steel on Steel" is a news radio forum covering politics, religion and economics.

Click here the listen to the interviews


Important! - Do not click on the "Unsubscribe" link at the top of this e-mail or you will be removed from all JINSA lists including JINSA Reports.  If you wish to unsubscribe please contact JINSA at feedback@jinsa.org
Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to davidlevy68.people@blogger.com by info@jinsa.org.
JINSA | 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 515 | Washington | DC | 20036